Archive for the ‘Asia’ Category

China Blames Attack on Muslim Separatists

August 5, 2008

[August 4, 2008]
China Blames Attack on Muslim Separatists
New York Times, United States
KASHGAR, China — A day after two men attacked a military police unit in the country’s far northwest, killing 16 and wounding 16 others, the Chinese authorities sought to portray the ambush as an act of terrorism and said the men were members of an outlawed organization they contend has links to Al Qaeda…
Technorati –

Curfew in East Timor following assasination attempt (E. Timor and war on Islamic terror)

February 12, 2008

Curfew in East Timor following assasination attempt (E. Timor and war on Islamic terror)

February 11th, 2008 by Nancy Reyes

Nobel prize winner and president of East Timor has been airlifted to an Australian hospital following an assasination attempt connected with an attempted coup.
In the meanwhile, his country is under a curfew.

The accused assassin is an ex General, Alfredo Reinado, who was killed in the attempted assassination, along with one rebel and one of the president’s bodyguards. An hour later, the country’s Prime minister’s motorcade was attacked.

The unrest by disaffected militants has been growing in the last year or two.

Australia will send more troops and police to help that country to stay peaceful.

East Timor was originally taken over by Indonesia in 1976 and suffered many massacres because of an insurgency fighting for independence. However, once the UN decided to let them vote, over 100 000 were killed in massacres by suspected Indonesian incited nationalists.

There is an active connection of (majority Christian) East Timor to the war on terror.

One, the Bali bombing that killed hundreds, including almost a hundred Australians, was in retaliation for the UN sponsored Australian troops who were sent in to stop the massacres.

Two: one early suicide bombing of the UN in Baghdad was not about the US, but against the UN diplomat who also had been active in obtaining independence for East Timor.

The continuing unrest and the now attempted coup should remind people that after wars, there tends to be disagreements that those used to violence will quickly resort to violence again.

Despite Emergency Rule Declaration, Islamic Extremists Seize Pakistani Town

November 6, 2007

Despite Emergency Rule Declaration, Islamic Extremists Seize Pakistani Town

November 6, 2007 10:27 a.m. EST Julie Farby – AHN News Writer Islamabad, Pakistan (AHN)-

In an effort to clamp down on the growing Islamic militant threat, Pakistan’s President Gen. Pervez Musharraf declared a state of emergency over the weekend, suspending the constitution, censoring the media, and granting broad powers to police and other authorities to quash dissent. Meanwhile, in Pakistan’s volatile northwest region, Islamic militants seized three police stations and a military post in the town of Matta, after outnumbering Pakistani security and police forces in the area. The security forces reportedly offered no resistance against the militants in the area who swear allegiance to Maulana Fazlullah, a fiery cleric who is accused of fanning dissent by Musharraf. Despite Musharraff’s nationwide crackdown on the media, opposition leaders in Pakistan still managed to call for defiance against the government-led emergency rule declaration. Deposed Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhury, who is currently under house arrest in the capital of Islamabad, was able to briefly coordinate a telephone conference urging lawyers to revolt against Musharraf’s rule of law. Chaudhury, one of several opposition leaders able to use Musharraf’s emergency declaration as a catalyst for renewed protest against the government, said, “I want lawyers to spread my message: the time for sacrifice has come and to stand up for the constitution. There will be no dictatorship.” In response to growing international criticism of Musharraf’s emergency declaration, Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammed Sadiq said the decision was “purely Pakistan’s internal matter,” and that parliamentary elections could be delayed by up to three months as a result. Technorati –


November 6, 2007

ISLAMIC THREAT, NUCLEAR PAKISTANI FRONTUnderstanding Al-Qaeda’s Pakistan PSYOP and Insurgency

Understanding Al-Qaeda’s Pakistan PSYOP and Insurgency
The Troubling Effectiveness of al-Qaeda’s PSYOP On The Pakistani Army

By Steve Schippert

Going forward in the global conflict before us, it is important to acknowledge and understand that al-Qaeda is currently engaged in an Information Operation (IO) campaign inside Pakistan. This is in addition to its efforts to gain influence outside of Pakistan, particularly with Muslims in Europe, the Middle East and in the US. The primary target of the Pakistan campaign is the Pakistani military and it is driven by al-Qaeda’s accelerating insurgency inside Pakistan. Understanding how and why al-Qaeda has undertaken this effort allows decision makers greater understanding of al-Qaeda’s aims and equips them with a ‘lay of the land’ required to counter al-Qaeda’s message and objectives.

Usama bin Laden’s latest recorded message is the third in just two weeks following three years of virtual silence from the al-Qaeda leader. In it, bin Laden calls on Pakistani Muslims to acknowledge that Musharraf’s actions are examples of his loyalty to the United States and representative of his unbelief. For bin Laden and his compatriots, such unbelief marks Musharraf as ‘kufr’ and places the requirement on believers to make “armed rebellion against him.” The misguided understanding that bin Laden and al-Qaeda have of Islam makes it obligatory to fight against those who rule outside of their interpretation of Islam, and its overly broad application of tawhid. Yet bin Laden crafts a different message for the Pakistani Army, whom he advises to “resign” from their jobs, “disassociate yourself from Pervez and his Shirk (polytheism)” and “enter anew into Islam.” There is a reason for this, which will be discussed below.

Ayman al-Zawahiri’s latest video message and bin Laden’s audio message, released on the same day, mark as-Sahab’s 77th and 78th propaganda productions this year alone. There is a clear shifting of gears in the al-Qaeda Information Operations, most notably within Pakistan as well as their international efforts surrounding the 6th anniversary of the September 11th attacks.

Before looking further into the al-Qaeda Pakistani IO campaign, we must address the al-Qaeda-Taliban insurgency actively ongoing in Pakistan.

al-Qaeda in Pakistan – From Terrorism to Insurgency

There is, of course, no single agreed upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in the US Code of Federal Regulations as “…the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85) For instance, terrorism is – among other things – a tactic employed to increase support for a group through inspiration while also decreasing effective resistance to the group through intimidation. An example of this type of terrorism would be the beheading of those deemed to be ‘spies’ for the Americans in South Waziristan, the multiple car bomb and rocket attacks, or the anti-aircraft assassination attempts on Musharraf. Additionally, the bombings that took place after the Pakistani government raid on Lal Masjid (the Red Mosque) are an example of the use of terror to gain influence. No matter the definition of terrorism being applied, al-Qaeda has clearly been a terrorist organization in Pakistan.

Beyond Pakistan, Al-Qaeda seeks to – in part – influence American foreign policy through terrorist means. But within Pakistan, al-Qaeda has clearly and by specific design transformed from being simply a dangerous international terrorist group within Pakistan to a full-fledged internal insurgency against it. This transformation is represented through the efforts of al-Qaeda to acquire the armored assets of a state Army and its nuclear weapons, as well as the pursuit of land holdings to be integrated into the larger objective of creating an Islamic state to be ruled by a successor to the Prophet, a Khalifa or Caliph, nearly 1350 years after the last of the ‘rightly guided’ rulers.

An insurgency is a movement with specific governmental designs on the host country. In Countering Evolved Insurgent Networks, Col. Thomas X. Hammes (USMC, Ret.) quotes Bard O’Neill to define an insurgency. O’Neill wrote, “Insurgency may be defined as a struggle between a nonruling group and the ruling authorities in which the nonruling group consciously uses political resources (e.g., organizational expertise, propaganda, and demonstrations) and violence to destroy, reformulate, or sustain the basis of one or more aspects of politics.”

In more accessible terms, offers that the ultimate goal of an insurgency “is to challenge the existing government for control of all or a portion of its territory, or force political concessions in sharing political power.”

Both aptly describe al-Qaeda’s actions, operations and aims within Pakistan, a ready-made nuclear power which the terrorist group seeks to wrest complete control.

Perhaps the best way to describe al-Qaeda’s Pakistan insurgency is to call it a “Death by a Thousand Cuts.” They have openly sought not only the assassination of Pervez Musharraf, but also the demise – or reconfiguration – of the Pakistani national government. In a strategy that has been executed with remarkable patience, al-Qaeda has gained acknowledged control of several sizable territories in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas.

After defeating Pakistani forces on the battlefield, the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance have secured various ‘peace accords’ replete with concessions from the Musharraf government. Effective control of North Waziristan, South Waziristan, Bajour and Swat have been ceded to them and Pakistani forces were – upon agreement – effectively withdrawn from the areas handed the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance through the accords. The accords, no matter how presented by the Musharraf government, represented abject defeat.

Al-Qaeda Insurgency: Destination – Islamabad

Domination in these territories has allowed al-Qaeda the haven necessary to rebuild its training and planning infrastructure as well as replenish its human resources. After a few short weeks of basic military training, Taliban conscripts are sent in waves across the border to battle US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan.

However, al-Qaeda has no designs on investing in regaining that territory. There are no resources for them there – and a more formidable, if reduced, military force to be reckoned with. One whose defeat of the terrorist group drove them into Pakistan’s border regions to begin with. Al-Qaeda’s designs are not back towards the west, but rather onward deeper into the heart of Pakistan.

While al-Qaeda’s Pakistan insurgency has been largely waged in the FATA region, it’s territorial aims are by no means limited to it. Rather, al-Qaeda seeks control of all of Pakistan, including its military, weapons and economic capabilities. Al-Qaeda has been executing this strategy one territory, one victory at a time. And it now closes in on Islamabad.

Indeed, an analysis by the Pakistani Interior Ministry warned Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf of precisely this. The New York Times reported that the 15-page internal Pakistani document warned Musharraf that “the influence of the extremists is swiftly bleeding east and deeper into his own country, threatening areas like Peshawar, Nowshera and Kohat, which were considered to be safeguarded by Pakistani government forces.” The Interior Ministry document said that Peshewar endures the “highest number of terrorist incidents, including attacks on local police,” and that in Bannu and Tank regions, police are “patronizing the local Taliban and have abdicated the role of law and order.”

It is important to note that Peshewar is the capital of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP). Much of the Pakistani government, non-Islamist educators, officials and police forces live inside heavily armed and walled communities in the NWFP, where they are more safe from al-Qaeda attack. The NWFP borders the Federally Administered Tribal Areas under direct Taliban-al-Qaeda control on one side and the Pakistani capital of Islamabad on the other. The rising violence is a clear indicator of the expansion of al-Qaeda’s insurgency as it marches patiently but steadily toward Islamabad. As evidenced by bin Laden’s latest message, that patience may be nearing an end.

Usama bin Laden’s latest message implored the Pakistani public to take up arms against Musharraf and warned the army’s soldiers to break ranks and fight Musharraf with al-Qaeda rather than serve him. This is a sign that al-Qaeda’s patient approach to its Pakistan insurgency has run its course. There could be a maelstrom of events to follow in Pakistan.

AQ Targets Police for Violence and Army Soldiers for Influence

The al-Qaeda Information Operation (IO) is designed to support the insurgency’s incremental march on Islamabad. The key to understanding the al-Qaeda IO and its insurgency goals is to understand how al-Qaeda primarily targets Pakistani Interior Ministry forces (police, constabularies and the Frontier Corps) for physical attack while targeting Pakistani regular army forces for influence and subversion.

The persistent mention of Pakistani police forces – rather than Pakistani Army forces – is expected in any Pakistani Interior Ministry report, as the Police forces fall under the Interior. But Pakistani police forces also decidedly bear the brunt of al-Qaeda’s lethal attacks and not the Pakistani Army. It’s not that al-Qaeda and their indigenous Taliban allies cannot attack the Pakistani Army with expectations of success. They most certainly can and have. With bin Laden’s latest audio message delivering a combination invitation and ultimatum to Pakistani Army soldiers, al-Qaeda’s designs for the Pakistani Army are more clearly visible. The reason for attacking Pakistani police forces is two-fold and – in this writer’s view – also the most elusive and yet perhaps most important indicator of the ongoing al-Qaeda insurgency.

First, the Interior Ministry is widely regarded as the one segment of the Pakistani government with unwavering loyalty to Musharraf, whom al-Qaeda has sought to assassinate several times. Unlike the military and the military’s intelligence arm (ISI), the Pakistani police forces, constabularies and Frontier Corps of the Interior Ministry do not have historical ties to Islamist groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Interior Ministry loyalty to Musharraf makes their ranks logical targets for the Islamists who seek to kill and replace Musharraf atop an Islamist-run Pakistani government.

Secondly, and most importantly, al-Qaeda at the same time seeks to avoid open bloody conflict with the Army. Not because it fears the deadly consequences of such a confrontation, but rather because al-Qaeda senior leadership wants the Pakistani military intact – for themselves. Ideally, they do not want to ultimately find Musharraf killed or oustered only to have the military splintered internally between pro-government and pro-al-Qaeda commanders. Al-Qaeda is executing an insurgency to gain control, not to touch off a civil war.

In the end, al-Qaeda’s design is also to co-opt an intact military in order to gain command of a military force with the assets of a state (aircraft, armor, etc.) and direct control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. Recent reports of defections of Pakistani military elements since bin Laden’s latest message to them indicates a level of success in the al-Qaeda IO campaign targeting them.

Measuring al-Qaeda’s PSYOP Success

Three weeks ago, well over 200 Pakistani Army soldiers surrendered to a much smaller number of fighters from the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance without a shot fired. But the al-Qaeda IO campaign primarily targeting the Pakistani regular army forces has a spillover effect on other forces – and the general populace – as well. It is reported in Pakistan that many soldiers in the Pakistani Army, Frontier Corps paramilitary and police forces are refusing to fight or putting up little fight against their own countrymen inside the Federally Administered Tribal Area.

It is difficult to dispute the success of al-Qaeda’s Psychological Warfare efforts inside Pakistan. The message has been consistent for several years and al-Qaeda’s patience and restraint in seeing it through are significant qualities of the terrorist organization turned insurgent group. With every message and in all their forms, al-Qaeda has sought to convince the Army soldiers that they are not al-Qaeda’s enemy, rather that they are simply being misled by Musharraf. In bin Laden’s latest message, he said of the Pakistani Army, “we see the armies becoming tools and weapons in the hands of the Kuffaar [unbeliever, referencing Musharraf and the US] against the Muslims.”

This message resonates, as many Pakistanis are reluctant to take up arms against other Pakistanis, whether those they would confront are Taliban or al-Qaeda or not. It must also be considered that upwards of 30% of the Pakistani Army are, like the Taliban, ethnic Pashtuns. The vast majority of them are enlisted foot soldiers, as very few ethnic Pashtuns hold leadership positions, largely due to internal social and educational dynamics.

Even among the Pakistani police forces in the North West Frontier Province, many are said to have requested leave or simply deserted when faced with the outlook of deadly confrontations with fellow Pakistanis among the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance. In other instances, including the Interior Ministry’s report that specifically cited the Bannu and Tank regions, police are “patronizing the local Taliban and have abdicated the role of law and order.”

Where True Power Lies…And Grows

This is an indication that fear is also a prime motivator among Pakistanis. In the North West Frontier Province capital of Peshawar, al-Qaeda’s black banner of jihad can be seen displayed in the widows of many shops and flying in various places. This does not necessarily mean that there is explicit support in the hearts and minds of all Pakistanis there – even among those flying the al-Qaeda banner.

Though Peshewar and the rest of the NWFP are technically under Pakistani state control, this indicates a reflection among the populace of where the true power lies – outside the walled communities where many government employees and ‘moderate’ citizens take refuge. In many cases, the al-Qaeda banner may well be flown simply out of self-protection to avoid attack on their particular shops.

The police cannot protect everyone all the time, but al-Qaeda and the Taliban can attack at their choosing. And from a local’s perspective, this is where the true power lies. And as more and more Pakistanis in the police forces, the Frontier Corps and the regular army begin to show a reluctance to do battle, the al-Qaeda power in these region grows, both in measurable means on the ground and within the minds of the Pakistani populace.

Such are the tangible gains of effective, persistent and robust al-Qaeda information operations, a classic PSYOP directed at both the Pakistani population writ large and also expressly directed at the Pakistani Army. As a result, Pakistani forces are engaging al-Qaeda and the Taliban less and less. In fact, President Musharraf announced that in 2008, there will be no Pakistani Army activity at all in al-Qaeda-held territory, deferring engagement to the less capable and less effective Frontier Corps and Pakistani police and constabularies.


The growing success of this long running al-Qaeda PSYOP makes it clear that the defeat of al-Qaeda and the elimination of their global headquarters in Pakistan will not come from Pakistani sources or initiative. As with so many other theaters in this global conflict, the initiative must again come directly from the United States. The American public and American political leaders must prepare themselves for the reality that, at this stage, defeating al-Qaeda in Pakistan most likely requires American boots on Pakistani soil.

The continued disengagement from the fight by Pakistani military forces unwilling to combat terrorists and insurgents within their own country is indeed troubling. President Musharraf’s recent decision to fully disengage and withdraw his most capable combat forces from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas by January 2008 certainly does not bode well for continued distanced engagement or non-engagement by American forces. In the end, defeating al-Qaeda in Pakistan will require direct American military action on the ground. The alternative is to accept the consequences of a strengthening al-Qaeda insurgency that is gaining momentum.

There can therefore be little debate that al-Qaeda and its global headquarters in Pakistan must be defeated before they consume Pakistan and the assets of a nuclear-armed state with professional military forces. The first step is an effective IO strategy of our own to counter this very powerful aspect of the insurgency. At current, only Pervez Musharraf openly engages the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance in the war of words and ideas within Pakistan. Unfortunately, these efforts amount to little given his poor domestic credibility. More Pakistani voices are required, and they must address the Pakistani people, bottom up, in a credible manner.


View Full Size Map


CNN Student News Transcript: November 5, 2007

CNN – Nov 4, 2007
Al Qaeda would certainly flourish in a country distracted by a worsening state of emergency. Then, there is the issue of the nukes

Al-Qaeda pursuing nukes, biological weapons: US

Daily Telegraph, Australia – Oct 9, 2007
The NIE, which prefigured much of today’s report, said al-Qaeda had regrouped in Pakistan “and would not hesitate” to use weaponas of mass destruction,22049,22561509-5006003,00.html
Technorati –

On this day Oct. 22

October 21, 2007



The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, also known as the Second Kashmir War, was the culmination of a series of skirmishes that occurred between April 1965 and September 1965 between India and Pakistan. The war was the second fought between India and Pakistan over the region of Kashmir, the first having been fought in 1947. The war lasted five weeks, resulted in thousands of casualties on both sides and ended in a United Nations (UN) mandated ceasefire. It is generally accepted that the war began following the failure of Pakistan’s Operation Gibraltar which was designed to infiltrate and invade Jammu and Kashmir.

Much of the war was fought by the countries’ land forces in the region of Kashmir and along the International Border between India and Pakistan. This war saw the largest amassing of troops in Kashmir, a number that was overshadowed only during the 2001-2002 military standoff between India and Pakistan. Most of the war was fought on land by each country’s infantry and armored units, with substantial backing from their air forces.

For more than ten years Islamic militants in the India/Pakistan state of Kashmir have been waging ethnic war against anyone not Muslim. Of course, no sides in these conflicts have been well behaved, terrorists are in almost every ethnic group. This photo here shows the result of a recent Muslim suicide bomber, Fifteen people were killed.

“If there is paradise anywhere on earth, it is here, it is here, it is here.”
— Mughal emperor Jehangi, on Kashmir

October 22, 1982: Daniel Jordan, a leader in the Bahai faith from California was assassinated by Iranian anti-Bahai terrorists. Jordan’s body was found in a Stamford, Connecticut parking lot. He had been murdered by a single stab wound in the neck. Jordan was dean of education at National University in San Diego. Followers of the religion had been executed in Iran under orders of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

October 22, 1982: Afghanis fired American-supplied rockets into the Soviet Embassy in Kabul in the first major attack against the compound since the Soviet Union intervened militarily in Afghanistan in December 1979.

October 22, 1986: For the second time this month, the Soviet Embassy in Lebanon was fired on by gunmen in a passing car. Muslims were not pleased that the Soviets had played hardball when compelled to rescue kidnap victims.

October 22, 1987: A missile attack on Kuwait’s largest offshore oil terminal destroyed the facility. Iran, which actually manufactures its own missiles (supplying most of them to Hizballah, the PLO, and HAMAS) was responsible.

October 22, 1996: A PKK suicide bombing in Sivas killed three policemen and the Islamic buffoon—a Muslim woman.October 1997: An international meeting was held in Tehran, Iran with over 20 Islamic terrorist groups in attendance. As a result, a campaign of attacks was planned against the Zionists and the Crusaders – Jews and Americans.

The Tehran summit decided to use non-Iranian Islamist organizations as the spokesmen for their agenda so as to give it a pan-Islamic flavor. Ayman al-Zawahiri’s al Jihad Group, an Egyptian Sunni organization, issued the initial communiqué calling for jihad against the U.S. and Israel. The press release from the world’s second best known terrorist read: “The United States will realize that its real enemy is Islamic Jihad, the Jihad of the entire Muslim nation against the world dominance of America, against the international influence of the Jews, and against the U.S. occupation of Muslim lands.”.

jihad. jihad, jihad, jihad.


October 22, 1999: Egypt closed the Cairo office of the Abu Nidal terrorist club, seizing the group’s bank accounts. If they closed the offices, it meant that for a decade or more, one of the world’s most murderous organizations – one that had killed Americans – was headquartered in Egypt.

October 22, 2000: An IED was detonated in a Cebu university in the Philippines.


10/22/01 Toyado.. Indonesia.. 2 Killed Two men murdered by Jihad terrorists.

10/22/01 Awantipora.. India.. 2 Killed 2 Wounded Two civilians killed by Fedayeen suicide attack.


10/22/02 Silver Spring.. USA.. 1 Killed Muslim sniper kills 35-year-old bus driver.

10/22/02 Kashmir.. India.. 5 Killed 7Wounded Five civilians are murdered by the Mujahideen in four separate attacks.


10/22/03 Hebron.. Israel.. 2 Killed Two settlers are injured in a gun battle with Palestinian infiltrators.


10/22/04 Medea.. Algeria.. 16 Killed 13 Wounded Armed Islamic extremists stop cars carrying young people to a soccer game at a phony roadblock. They then use knives and small-arms to kill sixteen. Thirteen others are missing.

10/22/04 Anantnag.. India.. 1 Killed 1 Wounded The Mujahideen assassinate a prominent moderate politician and critically injure his bodyguard.


10/22/06 Yarmuk.. Iraq.. 2 Killed Two street cleaners are murdered by Islamic terrorists.

10/22/06 Narathiwat Thailand 1 12 A column of Buddhist monks, on their way to receive alms for the poor, is bombed by Muslim militants.

10/22/06 Pattani.. Thailand.. 1 Killed A man is murdered by Muslim militants while walking home.

10/22/06 Madaen.. Iraq.. 9 Killed 3 Wounded Nine people are killed in a Religion of Peace sectarian clash.

10/22/06 Baqubah.. Iraq.. 13 Killed 25 Wounded Thirteen police recruits are murdered by a Jihadi bombing and shooting attack on their bus.

10/22/06 Baghdad.. Iraq.. 50 Killed Fifty victims of sectarian hatred within the Religion of Peace are found over a 24-hour period.

10/22/06 Amil.. Iraq.. 1 Killed Religious fundamentalists murder a barber.

10/22/06 Muzaffarnagar…India.. 1 Killed 12 Wounded A young Hindu is killed, and more than a dozen others injured, when Muslims object to a Diwali celebration.

10/22/06 Baghdad.. Iraq.. 5 Killed 6 Wounded Muslim terrorists bomb a street market, killing five innocents.

10/22/06 Bahawalpur.. Pakistan.. 1 Killed Radical Sunnis gun down a Shia cleric

Technorati –